N° 137May 17
TT
Instagram@zara61/100FashionInstagram@notion74/100SaaSTikTok@decathlon52/100Sporting goodsInstagram@glossier79/100BeautyInstagram@patagonia82/100Outdoor apparelTikTok@liquiddeath71/100BeveragesInstagram@zara61/100FashionInstagram@notion74/100SaaSTikTok@decathlon52/100Sporting goodsInstagram@glossier79/100BeautyInstagram@patagonia82/100Outdoor apparelTikTok@liquiddeath71/100Beverages
Editorial showcase@patagonia

The Teardown Times

02

Case file · live extract

Tonight's featured extract @patagonia Outdoor apparel 30 posts read
InstagramIG@patagonia · Patagonia
Good

82/100

The verdict

A brand that has nothing to prove and still pulls.

Patagonia's feed is what happens when a brand earns the right to post less. Volume is half the category average; engagement is double. The point of view is non-negotiable, the imagery is unmistakable, the activism is integrated rather than performed. The only soft spot: the audience that buys is older than the audience that engages.

The three subscores
Performance84/100

Engagement rate of 1.47% is exceptional for outdoor apparel. Per-post velocity is twice the category median.

Editorial health86/100

Voice and visual codes are among the strongest tracked. The slight weakness is hook predictability — 72% of posts open with landscape imagery.

Growth signals76/100

Posting cadence at 3.8 posts per week — well below the category. Brand strength compensates, but the funnel is narrow.